news you can use

New ad blasts Bush administration


Drug war, not youth, supports terrorism, group says




Posted: March 1, 2002

1:00 a.m. Eastern



By Jon Dougherty


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com




A noted drug reform group has placed an advertisement that parodies the Bush administration's linking of buying illegal drugs to supporting terrorism.



The New York-based Drug Policy Alliance's ad, which was placed in yesterday's issue of Roll Call, Capitol Hill's daily newspaper, seeks to point out that while the Bush administration is blaming American youth for terrorism, it is actually the drug war that creates the illegal markets that help fund terrorism.



The DPA ad features a full-page photo of President Bush, overlaid by these words: This month, I watched the Super Bowl, wasted 10 million taxpayer dollars on a deceptive ad campaign and shamelessly exploited the war on terrorism to prop up the failed war on drugs. ' C'mon, it was just politics.



Additionally, the ad says resources would be better spent on drug treatment and fighting real threats to national security.



The drug czar's office seems to think that American youth are as dumb as a doorknob, said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of Drug Policy Alliance. It's hard to believe that any American teenager smoking homegrown marijuana is going to believe she's subsidizing bin Laden's terror campaign. They're going to spoof these ads just the way they spoofed the 'fried egg' ads a decade ago.



The DPA ad is similar to an earlier full-page advertisement sponsored by the Libertarian Party and placed in Tuesday's editions of USA Today and The Washington Times.



The Libertarian-sponsored ad featured a picture of U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy Director John Walters, and featured this caption: This week, I had lunch with the president, testified before Congress and helped funnel $40 million in illegal drug money to groups like the Taliban. ' The war on drugs boosts the price of illegal drugs by as much as 17,000 percent ­ funneling huge profits to terrorist organizations. If you support the war on drugs or vote for the politicians who wage it, you're helping support terrorism.



Like the Libertarians, DPA officials say the government's so-called war against drugs has driven up the price of illegal narcotics, thus enhancing the profits of terrorist groups who grow and sell them to raise cash.



Blaming nonviolent Americans for terrorism is like blaming beer drinkers for Al Capone's murders, Nadelmann said.



Tony Newman, a spokesman for DPA in its New York office, told WorldNetDaily that the Bush administration's anti-drug policies seemed more aggressive than previous administrations.



I think the new development right now is that the government is coming out and blaming non-violent Americans for supporting terrorism, he said. That's obviously a post-Sept. 11 campaign, but they're basically saying that half of American high school kids are supporting terrorism.



In terms of funding, there hasn't been much difference in the way the government has approached its war on drugs over the past 10-12 years, said DPA's director of national affairs, Bill McColl.



It's really hard to change the numbers in funding, he told WorldNetDaily. The government's efforts are sort of geared toward criminal justice and law enforcement, interdiction and source-country control. So those areas are robustly funded.



However, he said, the Bush administration is re-emphasizing stigma ­ creating a sense that [drug use] should never happen and a clamp on any message other than, 'wrong, wrong, wrong.'



That's what's different from the Clinton administration and even [the first Bush presidency] ­ to maximize stigma, he said.



Tom Riley, communications director for the Office of National Drug Control Policy, told WorldNetDaily his office was actually pleased by the response the government's anti-drug ads were receiving.



What we're trying to do is get an idea out, he said. The whole plan of this campaign, and the way it's been structured, has been to promote discussion and debate this.



By publishing competing ads, the other groups are keeping this discussion going. By far, this is the most talked-about campaign we've [ever] done.



The Libertarian Party, the DPA and others have criticized the administration's decision to air two of its most controversial drug use equals terrorism ads during this year's Super Bowl game in February.



But the two ads, which cost $3.4 million, were some of the most effective anti-drug messages in years, Riley said.



After the Super Bowl and just one showing of those ads, an independent poll showed that over 50 percent of people who saw them could articulate the message in them, he said. Ninety million people watched the Super Bowl, so in essence, about 45 million people could tell you what the ads were about the next day. That's incredibly good penetration.



Riley also denied politics were behind the new campaign.



The first interjection of politics into this was the use of President Bush's image [in the DPA ad], he said. There is lots of bipartisan support on Capitol Hill for the administration's anti-drug and terrorism efforts.



Riley said other recent government-sponsored anti-drug ads were also successful because they provoked more parental involvement in prevention efforts aimed at teen-agers.



Every study in the world says parents are a kid's best prevention method, so we're trying to get them more involved, Riley told WND.



He said the Office of National Drug Control Policy's current media campaign budget of $180 million was first authorized by Congress in 1998.



In testimony before the House Reform Committee's Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, Walters said the agency's strategy was three-fold: Stopping drug use before it begins, increased drug treatment and disrupting the market.



We are using parents, educational institutions, the media and community action to prevent young people from experimenting with drugs in the first instance and starting on a path that all too often leads to addiction, crime and personal and familial destruction, Walters told the subcommittee.



In 1998, the agency said, Americans spent $66 billion on illegal drugs. Also, half of state and a third of federal prisoners reported committing their offense under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the agency says, quoting its most recent data.

Design copyright Scars Publications and Design. Copyright of individual pieces remain with the author. All rights reserved. No material may be reprinted without express permission from the author.

Problems with this page? Then deal with it...